I've written about deficient numbers in an eponymous post on January 28th 2018 and in which I mentioned, for the first time in my postings, the ratio between the sum of the divisors of a number and the number itself viz. \( \displaystyle \frac{\sigma_1(n)}{n} \).
In that post, I didn't refer to the ratio by its name of abundancy but in later posts I explored the concept of abundancy in more detail. Here are links to posts in which it was discussed:
- Multiperfect, Hyperperfect and Superperfect Numbers on July 24th 2019
- Friendly versus Solitary Numbers on December 16th 2020
- Hemiperfect Numbers on January 3rd 2021
The last two posts, as can be noted, are relatively recent. Today, in turning 26325 days old, I encountered a reference to abundancy once again. Specifically in the context of OEIS A188597:
A188597 | Odd deficient numbers whose abundancy is closer to 2 than any smaller odd deficient number. |
My diurnal age is a member of this sequence which runs:
1, 3, 9, 15, 45, 105, 315, 1155, 26325, 33705, 449295, 1805475, 10240425, 13800465, 16029405, 16286445, 21003885, 32062485, 132701205, 594397485, 815634435, 29169504045, 40833636525, 295612416135, 636988686495, 660733931655, 724387847085, 740099543085, 1707894294975, 4439852974095, 7454198513685
Figure 1 shows the progression:
Figure 1 |
Not surprisingly, all these numbers are highly composite, despite all being deficient. This can be seen in Figure 2 where a table of factorisation and number of divisors is presented.
Figure 2 |
There are a number of related sequences, one of them is OEIS A171929.
A171929 | Odd numbers whose abundancy is closer to 2 than any smaller odd number. |
Here the numbers need only to odd and can be abundant or deficient. Figure 3 shows the abundancy and its absolute difference from 2.
Figure 3 |
Another related sequence is OEIS A188263:
A188263 | Odd abundant numbers whose abundancy is closer to 2 than any smaller odd abundant number. |
In this sequence, all the numbers are abundant and thus their abundancy is greater than 2. Figure 4 shows a table of the initial numbers and their abundancies.
Figure 4 |
It's interesting to consider the idea that the limit of the abundancy of these sorts of odd abundant and odd deficient numbers is actually 2 as their abundancy can be as close to 2 as desired.
No comments:
Post a Comment