Edge With Decimal Rounded 1 20.645729 21 2 82.582915 83 3 185.81156 186 4 330.33166 330 5 516.14322 516 6 743.24624 743 7 1011.6407 1012 8 1321.3266 1321 9 1672.3040 1672 10 2064.5729 2065 11 2498.1332 2498 12 2972.9849 2973 13 3489.1282 3489 14 4046.5628 4047 15 4645.2890 4645 16 5285.3066 5285 17 5966.6156 5967 18 6689.2161 6689 19 7453.1081 7453 20 8258.2915 8258 21 9104.7664 9105 22 9992.5327 9993 23 10921.591 10922 24 11891.940 11892 25 12903.581 12904 26 13956.513 13957 27 15050.736 15051 28 16186.251 16186 29 17363.058 17363 30 18581.156 18581 31 19840.545 19841 32 21141.226 21141 33 22483.199 22483 34 23866.462 23866 35 25291.018 25291 36 26756.865 26757 37 28264.003 28264 38 29812.432 29812 39 31402.154 31402 40 33033.166 33033 41 34705.470 34705 42 36419.066 36419 43 38173.953 38174 44 39970.131 39970
Mathematical Meanderings
Friday, 21 August 2026
Surface Area of a Regular Dodecadhedron
Thursday, 20 August 2026
PRIME + and NON-PRIME - Improved Format
As with the EVEN + and ODD - and EVEN - and ODD + recursive algorithms, I've taken the original 393 page data document and converted it to a 83 page PDF that is more reader friendly. Here some excerpts.
![]() |
Figure 1 |
![]() |
Figure 2 |
![]() |
Figure 3 |
![]() |
Table 1 |
![]() |
Table 2 |
![]() |
Table 3 |
![]() |
Table 4 |
Wednesday, 19 August 2026
Temperature Conversion
I came across this interesting snippet of information today:
The trick works because the conversion slope between Celsius and Fahrenheit:$$\frac{9}{5} = 1.8$$closely mirrors how reversing a two-digit number changes its numerical value in base-10 arithmetic, combined with simple integer rounding.
The Exact Arithmetic
The standard conversion formula from Celsius ($C$) to Fahrenheit ($F$) is:
Every time $C$ increases by 12°C, $F$ increases by:
which is approximately 22°F.
Evaluating each step from the image reveals how closely the exact arithmetic matches the digit reversal:
- 04°C: $1.8(4) + 32 = 7.2 + 32 = 39.2$ → 39.2°F ≈ 40°F
(reversed digits: 04 → 40) - 16°C: $1.8(16) + 32 = 28.8 + 32 = 60.8$ → 60.8°F ≈ 61°F
(reversed digits: 16 → 61) - 28°C: $1.8(28) + 32 = 50.4 + 32 = 82.4$ → 82.4°F ≈ 82°F
(reversed digits: 28 → 82) - 40°C: $1.8(40) + 32 = 72.0 + 32 = 104.0$ → 104°F
(reversed digits: 40 → 04, plus a leading 1) - 52°C: $1.8(52) + 32 = 93.6 + 32 = 125.6$ → 125.6°F ≈ 126°F ≈ 125°F
(reversed digits: 52 → 25, plus a leading 1)
Why Digits Invert in Steps of 12
Let a two-digit Celsius value be represented by digits $a$ and $b$:
Its digit reversal $R(C)$ is:
If you add $12$ to $C$, the tens digit increases by $1$ and the units digit increases by $2$ (assuming no carryover):
The reversal of this new value is:
Because reversing digits after adding $12$ increases the reversed value by $21$, and the physical temperature conversion rate is $1.8 \times 12 = 21.6$, the rounded whole-number sequences track together with remarkable accuracy across the everyday range from 0°C to 50°C.
Super Sphenic Numbers
The number associated with my diurnal age today (28262) is what might be termed a "super sphenic number" as I'll explain in this post. Firstly however, its factorisation:$$28262=2 \times 13 \times 1087$$If we reverse its digits, we get the number 26282 and this number is also sphenic:$$26282 = 2 \times 17 \times 773$$Let's now concatenate the factors of 28262 in ascending order. This gives us the number 2131087 which is also sphenic:$$2131087 = 7 \times 167 \times 1823$$28262 has a sum of digits of 20 and if we add this to the original number we get the palindromic number 28282 which is also sphenic:$$28262+20=28282 = 2 \times 79 \times 179$$The number has a product of digits of 384I and if we subtract this from the original number we get 27878 which is sphenic:$$28262 - 384 = 27878 = 2 \times 53 \times 263$$If we consider only the internal digits of 28262, we get the number 826 which is also sphenic:$$2\, 826 \, 2 \rightarrow826=2 \times 7 \times 59$$When a sphenic number is considered as a sphenic brick then it has an associated number in the form of the brick's surface area. In the case of 28262, this associated surface area is 32662 square units and this number too is sphenic:$$32662 = 2 \times 7 \times 2333$$28262 has a sum of proper divisors that is also sphenic:$$ \sigma(28262) - 28262 =17434 = 2 \times 23 \times 379 $$The number has a sum of prime factors (1102) that is sphenic:$$2 +13+1087=1102 = 2 \times 19 \times 29$$28262 has a totient of 13032 which is not sphenic but its cototient (number - totient) of 15230 is:$$28262 - 13032 = 15230 = 2 \times 5 \times 1523$$So we can see that 28262 may well be termed a super sphenic number because of the above associations.
Tuesday, 18 August 2026
ODD - and EVEN + Improved Format
Some time ago I got Gemini to create a 197 page document that identifies attractors and vortices arising from the recursive ODD - and EVEN + algorithm. It also lists their number of captives. Today I got Gemini to summarise and reformat this information so that it is more readable using the exact same template it created for my August 15th post titled ODD + and EVEN - Improved Format. That 142 page document can be located here. Here are some excerpts:
![]() |
Figure 2 |
![]() |
Table 1 |
![]() |
Table 2 |
![]() |
Table 3 |
![]() |
| Table 4 |
Monday, 17 August 2026
28260: An Interesting Number
Sometimes it's difficult to find many interesting properties for numbers greater than 28000. However, 28260 is definitely not one of those sorts of numbers. It has a plethora of interesting properties and in this post I'll list some of them. Firstly though, let's list its prime factorisation:$$ \textbf{28260} = 2^2 \times 3^2 \times 5 \times 157$$PROPERTY 1: sum of two squares
As can be seen, the number is a product of a power of 2 (\( 2^2\)), a 4\(k\)+1 prime raised to an even power (\(3^2\)) and two 4\(k\)+1 primes (5 and 157). This means that it can be expressed as a sum of two squares in two different ways, viz.:$$ \begin{align} \textbf{28260} &= 6^2+168^2\\ \textbf{28260} &= 96^2+138^2 \end{align} $$PROPERTY 2: a, b, c, d number
It is what I've termed an \(a, b, c, d\) number because its digits can be rearranged to form three different numbers with the property that \(a+b+c=d\) where all four numbers share identical digits. In this case, there are two possible arrangements:$$ \begin{align} 26082 + 26280 + \textbf{28260} &= 80622\\ 26280 + 28062 + \textbf{28260} &= 82602 \end{align} $$PROPERTY 3: d-powerful number
It is digitally powerful (or \(d\)-powerful) because it can be expressed as a sum of positive powers of its digits. Here we have:$$ \textbf{28260} = 2^{14} + 8^4 + 2^2 + 6^5 + 0$$Of additional interest is that this number is the beginning of chain of ten consecutive numbers with this property. See Figure 1.
![]() |
Figure 1 |
It is an Ulam number. The Ulam sequence is defined by \(U_1=1\), \(U_2=2\) and, for \(k>2\), \(U_k\) is the smallest integer that can be written in exactly one way as \(U_i+U_j\) with \(i<j<k\). Here we have:$$ \textbf{28260}=3 + 28257$$PROPERTY 5: gapful number
It a gapful number defined as a number of at least 3 digits that is divisible by the number formed by its first and last digits. Here the first and last digits form the number 20 and 20 is indeed a divisor:$$ \frac{ \textbf{28260}}{20} = 1413$$PROPERTY 6: untouchable number
It is an untouchable number defined as a number \(n\) that is not the sum of the proper divisors of any number \(k\). In other words:$$ \textbf{28260} \neq \sigma(k)-k \text{ for any }k $$PROPERTY 7: inconsummate number
It is an inconsummate number defined as a number \(n\) for which there is no number $k$ such that \(k\) divided by its sum of digits (SOD) gives $n$. Thus we have:$$ \frac{k}{\text{SOD}(k)}\neq \textbf{28260} \text{ for any } k$$PROPERTY 8: tau number
is a tau number since it is divisible by its number of divisors. Here there are 36 divisors and we have:$$ \frac{\textbf{28260}}{36}=785$$PROPERTY 9: Harshad number
It is a Harshad number defined as number that is divisible by the sum of its digits. Here we have a sum of digits of 18 and:$$ \frac{\textbf{28260}}{18}=1570$$PROPERTY 10: zeroes of the Mertens function
It is a number where the Mertens function has a value of zero. It forms a pair of consecutive numbers with 28259.
I examined the Möbius and Mertens functions in a post titled The Möbius Function and Mertens Function on January 25th 2020. In number theory, we define the Mertens function as:$$M(n) = \sum_{1\le k \le n} \mu(k)$$where \( \mu (k)\) is the Möbius function. For any positive integer n, \(μ(n)\) has values in {−1, 0, 1} depending on the factorisation of \(n\) into prime factors:$$\mu(n) = \begin{cases} 1 & \quad \text{if } n \text{ is square-free + integer with even number of prime factors}\\ -1 & \quad \text{if } n \text{ is square-free + integer with odd number of prime factors}\\ 0 & \quad \text{if } n \text{ has a squared prime factor} \end{cases}$$Figure 2 shows the situation:
![]() |
| Figure 2 |
There are many other properties that the number has but this covers most of the more interesting.
Saturday, 15 August 2026
ODD + and EVEN - Improved Format
Some time ago I got Gemini to carry out an analysis for me of attractors and vortices in the range up to 40000 under the ODD + and EVEN - algorithm. I copied the output into a Google document that listed:
- each attractor and how many captives it had
- each vortex (along with the vorticals that comprised it)
- the number of captives the vortex had
- Attractor: 39642
- Captive Count: 395
- Captives: [38997, 39017, 39035, 39037, 39039, 39053, 39055, 39059, 39063, 39065, 39070, 39071, 39072, 39073, 39074, 39075, 39076, 39077, 39078, 39083] ... (and 375 more)
- Vortex (Vorticals): [38013, 38012, 38006, 37995, 38028]
- Captive Count: 564
- Captives: [37055, 37075, 37097, 37099, 37107, 37123, 37125, 37127, 37133, 37135, 37137, 37139, 37141, 37143, 37145, 37149, 37150, 37151, 37152, 37153] ... (and 544 more)
![]() |
Table 2 |
The document goes on to list vortices in ascending order and also in descending order by number of captives (see Tables 3 and 4):






















