When searching for interesting properties associated with the number (27491) representing my diurnal age, I encountered OEIS A335789:
A335789 | a(\(n\)) = time to the nearest second at the \(n\)-th instant (n>=0) when the hour and minute hands on a clock face coincide, starting at time 0:00. |
The initial members of the sequence are: 0, 3927, 7855, 11782, 15709, 19636, 23564, 27491, 31418, 35345, 39273, 43200, 47127, 51055, 54982, 58909, 62836, 66764, 70691, 74618, 78545, 82473, 86400, 90327, 94255, 98182, 102109, 106036, 109964, 113891, 117818, 121745, 125673, 129600, 133527, 137455, 141382
The comment is made that "after 12 hours or 43200 seconds, the hands overlap at 12:00 and the cycle repeats". What surprised me was that I was the author of this sequence, approved on August 14th of 2020, under the pseudonym of Sean Lestrange. I wrote about this sequence and related matters in a blog post titled Sexagesimal Number System on the same date. I'd quite forgotten about until I received this pleasant reminder.
Of course I no longer propose new sequences to the OEIS for reasons I've explained but I continue to make daily use of it. It's not the enormous body of sequences contained in the OEIS that I have a problem with. Instead it's the people who control the approval process.
This number of seconds corresponds to 7 hours 38 minutes 11 seconds. Figure 1 shows the clock's appearance for all those times when the hour and minute hands of the clock coincide (source).
No comments:
Post a Comment