Over the years I've sometimes made note of when a number associated with my diurnal age is congruent. Often I've just ignored the fact. The definition of such number is:
A number is called congruent it is the area of a right triangle with rational sides.
The first congruent number is 5 because it is the area of a right triangle with sides of 20/3, 3/2, and 41/6. The next number, 6, is also congruent being the area of the famous 3, 4, 5 right triangle. See Figure 1.
7 is also a congruent number being the area of a right triangle with sides such that (see Figure 2):$$ \begin{align} \Big ( \frac{35}{12} \Big )^2+ \Big ( \frac{24}{5} \Big )^2 &= \Big ( \frac{337}{60} \Big )^2 \\ \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{35}{12} \cdot \frac{24}{5} &= 7 \end{align}$$
Figure 2
With 7, we begin to see the problem of determining whether a number is congruent or not. How do we find those fractions that confirm that 7 is congruent. It's not easy. To quote from Wikipedia:
The question of determining whether a given rational number is a congruent number is called the congruent number problem. This problem has not (as of 2019) been brought to a successful resolution. Tunnell's theorem provides an easily testable criterion for determining whether a number is congruent; but his result relies on the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, which is still unproven.
No comments:
Post a Comment