Suppose we laid down the following criteria that prime numbers had to adhere to:
- formed from the nth number and the nth prime
- no repeating digits
- sum of digits is a prime number
The criterion that there must be no repeating digits means that we must have a finite number of such primes because, as the primes get larger, digits must repeat. Concatenating the first number 1 and the first prime 2, we get 12 which is not prime. However, concatenating the second number 2 and the second prime 3, we get 23 which satisfies the criteria. The next possibility, 35, doesn't satisfy but 47 does.
Writing a program that yields all the conforming primes up to ten million, yields the following select group where | represents the operation of concatenation:
- 2 | 3 --> 23
- 4 | 7 --> 47
- 12 | 37 --> 1237
- 27 | 103 --> 27103
- 57 | 269 --> 57269
- 58 | 271 --> 58271
- 85 | 439 --> 85439
- 93 | 487 --> 93487
- 145 | 829 --> 145829
- 406 | 2791 --> 4062791
- 591 | 4327 --> 5914327
- 835 | 6421 --> 8356421
Interestingly, apart from 2, all the nth numbers are composite in the range up to 999. This investigation arose from the number associated with my diurnal age today, namely 27103. It turned out that this number is a member of OEIS A084667:
A084667 | Primes which are a concatenation of n and prime(n). |
For this sequence, we are only applying the first criterion. The initial members of the sequence are shown below with previous primes marked in bold:
23, 47, 613, 1237, 1759, 1861, 2383, 27103, 30113, 35149, 36151, 41179, 42181, 45197, 46199, 54251, 56263, 57269, 58271, 61283, 71353, 82421, 83431, 85439, 92479, 93487, 99523, 115631, 117643, 119653, 121661, 123677, 127709, 136769, 141811, 145829, 147853
It can be noted that of the terms shown, the nth number in several cases is prime e.g. 1759, 2383 etc. I was interested in finding out how many primes survived once the second and third criteria were applied and 27103 survived as can be seen.
No comments:
Post a Comment