On April 1st 2019, my blog post was titled "42 is the new 33" and that time a solution to the problem of expressing 42 as a sum of three cubes had not been found. However, very recently, a solution was found as this Numberphile Video explains:
The solution is visible there in the thumbnail for the video but I'll repeat it below:X3+Y3+Z3=42 when
X=−80538738812075974
Y=80435758145817515
Z=12602123297335631
Certain numbers cannot be the sum of three cubes. The reason is that any cubic number must be equal to 0 or ±1 mod 9. If we add three cubic numbers together, the sum must therefore lie between -3 and +3 and so any number that is equal to 4 or 5 mod 9 (or equivalently ±4) cannot be expressed as a sum of three cubes. So between 1 and 99, the following numbers fall into this category: 4, 5, 13, 14, 22, 23, 31, 32, 40, 41, 49, 50, 58, 59, 67, 68, 76, 77, 85, 86, 94, 95.
It wasn't obvious to me why "any cubic number must be equal to 0 or ±1 mod 9". However, I finally realised why this was the case. Here is what I discovered:
Consider a number x that can be divided, by 9, n times leaving a remainder of r. This means that x=9n+r and so x3=(9n+r)3. This latter expression becomes:(9n)3+3×(9n)2r+3×(9n)r2+r3
It wasn't obvious to me why "any cubic number must be equal to 0 or ±1 mod 9". However, I finally realised why this was the case. Here is what I discovered:
Consider a number x that can be divided, by 9, n times leaving a remainder of r. This means that x=9n+r and so x3=(9n+r)3. This latter expression becomes:(9n)3+3×(9n)2r+3×(9n)r2+r3
Clearly 9 divides each term of the above expression, except perhaps the r3 term. Because we are considering modulus 9, the remainder r must lie between -4 and +4 (-4 is the same as +5, -3 is the same as +6 etc.). Let's consider each possible remainder:
- ±43=±64 and ±64≡±1mod9
- ±33=±27 and ±27≡0mod9
- ±23=±8 and ±8≡±1mod9
- ±13=±1 and ±1≡±1mod9
- 03=0 and 0≡0mod9
So there you have it, any cubic number must be equal to ±1 or 0 and so the sum of three cubes must lie between ±3. This excludes any number that is ±4 or ±5 mod 9.
Here are the numbers from 1 to 99 expressed as a sum of three cubes (zeroes allowed). The table was taken from an old site and I had to manually enter the values for 33, 42 and 74 because they were still empty:
![]() |
Figure 1: numbers between 1 and 29 |
![]() |
Figure 2: numbers between 30 and 64 |
![]() |
Figure 3: numbers between 65 and 99 |
As the YouTube video makes clear, the search is on for a solution to 114, the next "unknown" after 42, but also for a third solution to 3. The two current solutions are 13+13+13=43+43+(−5)3=3 but is there another solution? As yet, we don't know.
ADDENDUM: LINK
Well actually now we do know:3=5699368212219623807203+(−569936821113563493509)3+(−472715493453327032)3
ADDENDUM: LINK
Well actually now we do know:3=5699368212219623807203+(−569936821113563493509)3+(−472715493453327032)3
The only remaining unsolved cases up to 1,000 are 114, 165, 390, 579, 627, 633, 732, 906, 921, and 975.
No comments:
Post a Comment